Films / Women and Gender

Is ‘Prometheus’ a Feminist Pro-Choice Metaphor?

Originally published at Bitch Flicks. Warning: massive spoilers ahead!

A pseudo-prequel to Alien, Prometheus raises existential themes of religion, god, faith, science, creation, mythology and evolution. While these are all worthy topics, I’m much more interested in Prometheus’ treatment of its female characters. Is director Ridley Scott’s new film a pro-choice metaphor advocating reproductive justice?

I was ridiculously excited to see Prometheus. As I’ve shared before, Lt. Ellen Ripley was my icon growing up…as she was for many of us. And Scott admittedly loves showcasing strong, intelligent female leads.

Here the incredibly skilled Noomi Rapace plays the female protagonist Dr. Elizabeth Shaw, an archaeologist guided by her curiosity and buoyed by her religious faith. She and her colleague/partner Charlie Holloway discover caves with paintings signifying our creators or “Engineers” as they call them. When corporate Weyland Industries (a pre-cursor to Alien’s Weyland-Yutani) funds their expedition, they go in search of the beginning of humanity…with horrifying consequences.

The film is problematic with its weak dialogue and flimsy characters. Aside from Rapace’s Shaw and Idris Elba’s Janek (Stringer Bell cigar-smoking and playing an accordion?? Yes, please!), I seriously couldn’t give two shits who lived and who died, which is particularly annoying since Alien rested on the strength of its nuanced character development. But where the film captivates is in its exploration of reproduction.

Patriarchy perpetuates rape culture and infringes on reproductive rights. Alien centered on rape and men’s fear of female reproduction. Littered with vaginal-looking aliens and phallic xenomorphs violating victims orally, these themes resurface. But this time around, Scott’s latest endeavor also adds abortion and infertility. As ThinkProgress’ Alyssa Rosenberg asserts, Prometheus bolsters the Alien Saga’s themes of “exploration of bodily invasion and specifically women’s bodily autonomy.”

Holloway goes on a diatribe to Shaw about creation and meeting our creators. He says that everyone can create. Shaw responds, “Not me,” shedding tears as she laments her infertility, something rarely depicted on-screen. Their conversation seemed to comment on how society views women as broken and not fulfilling their ultimate purpose unless they give birth.

While Shaw doesn’t give birth, she does become pregnant.

When David the android (Michael Fassbender) obtains some of the mysterious “black goo” from the temple, he poisons Holloway by placing a drop in his drink. After Holloway and Shaw talk about creation and infertility, Shaw has sex with the infected Holloway.

After Holloway dies (torched by a flame-throwing-toting Vickers), David examines Shaw for any infection. He then tells her that she’s pregnant (say what??). She knows this is impossible because of her infertility. Even though she’s stunned by this revelation — because of its improbability and her infertility is a source of pain — Shaw wants it out of her immediately.

But David doesn’t want her to have an abortion, insisting she be put in stasis and trying to restrain her. Like Ash in Alien, it appears David had an agenda to try and keep the creature inside Shaw alive. David tries to thwart Shaw’s agency and bodily autonomy, forcing her to remain pregnant. Hmmm, sounds eerily similar to anti-choice Republicans with their invasive and oppressive legislation restricting abortion. No one has the right to tell someone what to do with their body.

After fighting her way past people, Shaw enters a medpod, a surgical “chamber,” which is only designed for male patients. Now before anyone says that the chamber was intended for secret passenger Weyland (a dude), it still subtly reinforces patriarchy nonetheless. Why couldn’t a medical chamber offer procedures for all genders rather than just defaulting its calibrations to male?

Undeterred, she programs the machine to remove a foreign object. She watches as her stomach is the mechanical arms remove the alien creature and then is stapled up. Hands down this was the most riveting scene (and squeamish…aside from that creepy eye scene), watching a terrified yet steely determined Shaw assert control over her body and her reproduction.

Now, not everyone agrees that Shaw was pregnant or that her procedure should be called an abortion. Some say yes, others argue no, and still others are unsure. Rosenberg asserts it’s not really an abortion as Shaw “isn’t pregnant but rather infected” and the surgery doesn’t result in “the termination of her pregnancy but a premature birth.” But Scott himself calls it a pregnancy.

For those who discount Shaw’s abortion because it’s a foreign object or not a traditional fetus, look at Breaking Dawn. Bella’s fetus grew at a rapid rate, made her sick and almost destroyed her body. Yet she chose to keep it. My point is that Shaw could have as well. Instead, she chooses an abortion.

But whatever terminology you use — and I’m in the camp that calls it an abortion — you can’t ignore the abortion metaphor.

Rather than merely succumbing to the trappings of the Mystical Pregnancy Trope, which reduces women to their reproductive organs, we instead see a metaphor for patriarchal constraints trying to strip women of their reproductive rights and bodily autonomy.

But before I start jumping up and down that a summer blockbuster features an abortion, there’s a few probs here. The word abortion is never uttered. Nope, not once. Instead, it’s referenced as a “procedure.” When Shaw enters the medpod, she initially attempts to program a cesarean, again not an abortion.

Prometheus also suffers from some problematic gender depictions. While both Prometheus and Alien thrust their female leads into terrifying situations, Shaw and Ripley drastically differ, not only in their personalities and worldviews. But in the way the films treat them.

Alien possessed a strong feminist commentary on sexist patriarchy silencing women’s voices and attempting to objectify and violate their bodies. Unlike Ripley, both Shaw and the icy, seemingly villainous Vickers are sexualized. Both Shaw and Vickers are punished — Vickers by falling into the stereotypical trap of being a cold, selfish shrew and Shaw for her sexuality. Although I’ve got to point out that while Vickers was definitely selfish (not stopping to help a stumbling Shaw when outrunning the crashing ship), I think she made some smart decisions surrounded by an assload of people making idiotic ones. And um, I don’t blame her for not wanting an infected Holloway onboard (which Ripley also tried to do with Kane in Alien). Weyland also makes a sexist statement about inheritance and how David is the closest thing he has to a son, despite his flesh and blood daughter Vickers. It’s as if a daughter is meaningless to him.

 Ripley wasn’t defined by her relationship to a man nor did she need a man to survive. But Shaw does…or at least an android taking the form of a man. Yes, she’s a resilient survivor. Although David makes a point to express his surprise at Shaw’s survival, saying he didn’t know she had it in her (ugh, cue bad pun). But aside from her self-induced abortion, Shaw ultimately must rely on others: the squidlike xenomorph extracted during her abortion to save her from a violent Engineer as well as David to escape the planet as he can fly the Engineers’ spacecraft. Although Shaw is the one who determines their course.

Perhaps these gender problems are meant as a commentary on the incessant sexism plaguing today’s society. Or maybe Ripley was such a quintessential feminist film icon that this film pales in comparison.

While it’s not as feminist as it could or should be, The Mary Sue’s Zoe Chevat sums up what I liked most about Prometheus:

“Mixing in allusions to birth, the body as battleground, and a female character’s absolute will to regain control belong in this series as much as slimy extraterrestrials. It’s what the Alien films do well, and what Prometheus does best.”

Prometheus is an incredibly flawed film. But when reproductive justice faces a daily barrage of attacks, I have to applaud its efforts to depict its female protagonist not only choosing an abortion, but fighting for her right to exercise autonomy over her body. Especially when so few films and TV series do.

About these ads

11 thoughts on “Is ‘Prometheus’ a Feminist Pro-Choice Metaphor?

  1. Pingback: PROMETHEUS – Rymdmonster och Livsfrågor som spretar « Paulus Indomitus

  2. Are you devoid of any sense of FUN? I am a gay man who was raised by a feminist mother (and no that is not why I am gay; I have an older brother who is very much a macho-pig) so I get that media sometimes is offensive and it seems like their is an agenda there to oppress blah, blah, blah, blah. But you take the fun out of everything. Prometheus was a thrilling sci-fi movie that left me speechless and thinking.
    You sound like that other blogger at breaktheillusion.com. He is a gay blogger who was offended by Sherlock Holmes 2. Come on people. Sometimes a movie is just a movie and you are just a blowhard.

    • @Chris – Thanks for pointing out I’m no fun…I’ll be sure to get on that right away. So why are you comparing me to a blogger who was offended by ‘Sherlock Holmes 2?’ I wasn’t offended by anything in ‘Prometheus.’ In fact, I praise the film for its pro-choice and empowering themes. Or perhaps you think I’m a “blowhard” and a fun-stealer for analyzing a film? I happen to find that fun. But that’s just me.

  3. @Chris – Well, i’m a straight male, raised by a gay father & feminist mother (just kidding…)

    Actually, i gotta agree with Chris.
    I found the film very entertaining & interesting, but i didn’t relate any sub-context of the
    director making a statement for or against abortions.
    I think the “procedure,” was simply a “procedure.”

    But it did get me thinking afterwards, to some of the bigger questions…

  4. You’re complaining about the fact that Shaw couldn’t save herself and instead had to use external means to save herself from the engineer?! You’re telling me that the survival of a woman who uses her surroundings to save herself is somehow not as “worth it” because she didn’t do it on her lonesome?! Then I guess Ripley shouldn’t have used the exoskeleton to kick Queen Xeno’s tail…but no…that was ingenuity at work.

    Honey, we all belong to the human species. As such we are social animals, programmed to need others to survive. Shaw was a scientist, and intelligent woman…do you think that maybe she could’ve punted Davids broken behind to the curb and figured out how to work that ship herself? Yes she could have, however I believe the choice to keep David was two fold: One she didn’t have the time to learn how to operate a ship. David knew how, so she kept him. Secondly, the need for human companionship is ingrained very deeply into our psyche. It could be she needed the company.

    And guess what that’s ok.

  5. Pingback: Created in thy image « Journeyman

  6. My only issue with this film, was that the Aliens were not ethnically diverse…

    I kid! i kid!

    I know the opinioness, personally, and i will vouch for her most exceptional sense of humor!

  7. I also think that Scott deserves praise for exploring the value of faith and other existential issues through Shaw. Perhaps, because she is a woman(especially because she is infertile) Shaw has a greater capacity to understand the meaning of life. Also, I love the contrast between her interactions with David and Charlie’s. While Charlie is antagonistic, she does nothing to provoke David’s brutal antics, and of course Shaw survives the whole ordeal. As a whole the movie was a mixed bag, but it’s great to see a sci-fi movie that has complex characterization of women.

  8. Really people, the Alien series is one THE most heavily studied film series in terms of feminist critiques and all you can think to say is that questioning the reproductive choice issues presented by removal of an alien fetus is “reading too much into it”? Go away, read up on the critiques referenced and then come back and talk pretty. Thank you.

  9. I support a woman’s right to have abortions. However, I still believe abortions are tragic, no matter the circumstances.

    You, however, seem to delight in them.

    “But before I start jumping up and down that a summer blockbuster features an abortion, there’s a few probs here.”

    Also, one of the most powerful women I’ve ever heard speak, one who is a champion for education and the empowerment of young women was conceived when her mother was raped. Obviously, she is grateful for her mother’s decision not to abort her.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s